Fatal Car Accident Arkansas – DUI-driving under the influence, or DUI, became common in the news lately; celebrities, teen, for College parties and so on. This has become quite common among adults and adolescents. Lindsey Lohan, Mel Gibson, Tony Rock (brother of Chris Rock), Mike Tyson, Rebecca De Mornay, Nick Bollea, Parris Hilton, Nicole Richie, Ray Liotta, Vivica a. Fox; Tony LaRussa, Warren Moon and Shia LaBeouf are just some of the celebrities who were caught in the Centre of the attention of the famous DUI. It seems we do not pay attention to statistics and news stories because, on average, a person dies every 40 minutes by a drunk driver.
DUI or DWI became today in our society. In 2002, 2.3 United 18 and older surveyed reported alcohol-conduccion of vehicles affected and. Compared with the survey of 1997 of this population equally, the amount for this year is 2.1. According to the National Commission against the drunk driving (NCADD), more than 20% of all deaths from traffic in the United States each year is cause by drunken driving. DUI or DWI proved to be mortal before we know. Drivers often seem more the fact that the DUI or DWI is dangerous. People don’t take the time to understand the tragic consequences of the DUI and the underlying danger.
I understand that we live in a society that is deeply secular and that parties and good times is part of human nature, but the key is responsibility. I’m sure you’ve heard of MADD (mothers against drunk driving) and the campaign of SADD (students against destructive decisions) out there. MADD is a non-profit that aims to stop driving drunk, those affected by driving drunk to help avoid underage drinking and the global drive for stricter alcohol policy. The Organization was founded in 1980, in Irving, Texas, by Candice Lightner, when a 13-year-old daughter was killed by a drunk driver, Clarence Busch. On the other hand, SADD, students against drunk driving founded in 1981 in Wayland, Massachusetts, developed a youth prevention-to-peer’s dominant nation with more than 10,000 chapters in schools, colleges and universities in the United States (United States). In 1997, in response to requests students SADD, SADD developed mission and name and now sponsors called students against destructive decisions chapters.
The company continues to support the message of “no use” of SADD regarding the use of alcohol and other drugs. With an expanded focus, SADD now highlights prevention of destructive behaviors and attitudes that are harmful to young people, including underage drinking; distracted driving, substance abuse, violence and suicide. More campaign drinking responsible Member States. Responsible for the inclusion of the liquor party ahead of time. He is a designated driver, planning to sleep in the homes of friends, if the Feast was celebrated there or sleep in your car, if you’re in a bar or club. Don’t become a statistic or a part of the statistics. We have to be sufficiently responsible to understand the consequences and the impact of drunken driving puts on you as an individual and the community.
I’d like to introduce some of the family. Here is my first family. A photo of him and the mother of three children who attend large family gatherings and on the way home, her children with their grandmother and your car is in front of you. Suddenly, a driver who goes on the address wrong, drunk, reaches his family directly. Their mother and 3 children died instantly in front of your eyes. Imagine that pain, suffering and pain that you have to suffer for the rest of his life. Someone decided to take a chance with his life and took the lives of four instead of his own. This is what happened to Cassie Crapps 26 year, February 06, 2008 in Arkansas. three of his sons and the mother was killed by a criminal determined repetition be responsible. He wants to party and take the risk. “You can eat your cake and have it”. This word is the truth. When it comes to human life, especially when the other person is a concern, you can not take any chances.
Life is not about the game; LIFE IS SO PRECIOUS. This is one of those things that cannot be someone when it is taken; You don’t have that power. You can hurt someone by saying something wrong and apologized to them, and will forgive you. Although hurting someone’s feelings, there is still a way to make him understand through your excuses. You can damage something and be able to return the money or other products and services. However; When you hurt someone or taking the life of a person, never will be replaced, disappointment, pain, pain, pain and suffering for the love that I felt was left to carry the burden of this or treat injuries. It was an indescribable pain. The hole was so deep that no matter how many received condolences, cannot fill the place never vacant.
Motorcyclists always assessment the use of motorcycle helmets. This is just a matter of preference or there are important to take into account issues? A friend of mine (Bill), we decided to go with a helmet, or sometimes without a motorcycle helmet. He said it depends on the condition of the trip for him. One day was on the two-lane road, route of approximately of 50 km/h, when the tractor trailer trucks out of the right side of the road to go in the same direction. The idea is to keep the speed and the truck. [I.e., the possibility of this is possible.] Unfortunately it has no any trucker sufficient space to turn and stopped dead still, crossing the line in second place. Bill is now approaching the van too fast and too close to stop safely. He struggled, but rest knew immediately that faced beside the trailer. With the quick thinking, put the Harley on the side and slid under the trailer and on the road, about 100 feet.
Transmit the story to me, he went back, feet first, with open arms and head singing it on the road. When everything is finished he gave credit to God for help and praised his helmet is destroyed due to save his life. [In addition, the leather jacket and gloves have taken the place of her tears. [Friends only] suffers from some muscle aches and pain pride. However, I brought the issue of safety helmets. Breaking news from KSL – TV of southern Jordan, Chief of police (and Pearson) also are taught people that helmets save lives, after having lost three friends to motorcycle accident in two years. The three suffered head injuries and not carrying a motorcycle helmet. Later, the police Chief, was involved in an accident on the Highway 89 North of Afton, Wyoming. A truck towing a horse has passed and pulled in front of it, hit the front of the engine carries a spare tire mounted on the back. And he was released from his bike, the head of the landing. He said, “the damage is definitely a coup fatal if I don’t have a helmet”. And suffered bruises and some broken bones.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported that motorcyclists survive accidents and received less serious injuries, when he wore a helmet. It was reported that at least 600 people are saved each year. One question, “do helmet that protects your brain, but can increase the chances of a broken neck?” Dr. Michael Yorgason, surgeon in mountain orthopedics and sports medicine, said the findings of the medical literature shows: “studies after the fatal accident has shown that neck injuries and broken bones can be the same, if you are wearing a helmet or not autopsy.” However, most of the report supports the use of motorcycle helmets. They believe that helmets are, in general, the risk of injury to the head and brain decreased significantly and suspect that use them does not increase the risk of injury in the neck.
Italy study concluded that helmet injuries decreased by 66%. Study in Thailand found that after making a mandatory helmet, head injuries fell 41% in 2 years. Now, in Kentucky, a study revealed that brain injury increased 4.3 times when you do not wearing a helmet. In an article written by Jonathan p. Goldstein, PhD.titulado “the impact of the use of a motorcycle helmet in the possibility of death and the severity of injuries in the neck and head. It is concluded that there are a number of variables studied, since the study in question. The main difference is carried out on the use of a helmet or no helmet use. Normal results compare the death and injury rate is two and three times higher than for non-pilot helmet and year reversal rate of incidence ranging from 19% to 63%.
On the one hand: the study of verses not helmet do not consider pilots. He said that the pilot is more cautious by nature. One, driving more slowly, so it has a slower in the accident. Secondly, they are less likely to have an accident. Three, carriers are less likely to drink and drive (use of alcohol or drugs). These behavior changes drastically reduces the risk of drivers. On the other hand, factors to consider are: the age average of 1 mile in 2 half biker expelled each year, each experience in 3 4 biker motorcycle biker of average size. Thus, between the size of the bike, speed, age, potential risk and alcohol consumption; simple and realistic use of helmets.
Approach to study of Goldstein which refer to these variables. It reports a study that evaluates the effectiveness of the helmet in an accident situation.
The conclusions that: 1 – engine effect is not statistically significant on the likelihood of death. 2 helmets reduce the severity of head injuries. 3-passed-critical impact speed of 13 km/h, a helmet increased the severity of neck injury. Then, the report concluded that helmet users face a trade-off between reducing the severity of injuries in the head and an increase in the severity of the injury on the neck. In this state the compulsory helmet laws used to be an effective method to prevent the dead or injured when involved in an accident. Countries of the world, prohibiting the use of cell phones while driving. The reason to do this, then, is the high number of accidents caused by cell phone use while driving. According to an investigation carried out by the transport of the Virginia Tech Institute, which installed a tracking device on people’s behavior-241 vehicles, distracted drivers are four times more likely to get distracted in a collision of free drivers.
Cell phone turned out to be one of the largest sources of distraction to drivers and even has caused many fatal accidents in the world. Several countries take measures to reduce the risk of the road with the prohibition of the use of mobile phones while driving, this can have a direct impact on the policies and car insurance rates. The exception of the use of mobile phones. There are some exceptions on how you can use a cell phone while driving. They are different from country to country and State to State (or province), but there are some universal characteristics: or call 911 is allowed at any time in case of emergency (or calls to different emergency services in countries other than the United States and Canada). the use of ear piece wireless hands-free (not in all countries). The use of the mobile device in hand and the transmitter that allowed the use of emergency personnel. To view the screen of a display device that offers GPS instructions turn are allowed.
Countries that officially ban the use of cell phones while driving: Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Belgium, Botswana, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Czech Republic, Denmark, Egypt, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India-Nueva Delhi, Ireland, Isle of Man, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jersey, Jordan, Kenya, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Pakistan, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Singapore, the Republic of Slovakia , Slovenia, South Africa, Korea of the South, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Kingdom, Zimbabwe. Please note that to be included in the list, the State banned the use of cell phones in the car, at least in a province. For example, in Canada it is legal the use of lead and the cell phone while driving in British Columbia, but is illegal in Ontario.
United States banned the use of cell phones while driving: (Partial) Arkansas (partial) of Arizona, California, Connecticut, district of Columbia, Florida (partial), Georgia (partial), Hawaii (partially), Illinois (partial), Iowa (debated), Louisiana (partial), Maine (partial), Massachusetts (partial), Minnesota (partial), New Hampshire (part), New Jersey, New Mexico (part), New York, North Carolina (debate), Dakota North (debate), Ohio (partial), Oregon (partial), Pennsylvania (partial), South Carolina (partial), Tennessee (partial), Virginia (partial), Washington. A partial reference to fines, penalties and any other actions taken by countries against the use of the phone. Partial means that although it is not illegal to use a mobile phone while driving, apply some conditions; that is, if there is an accident.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration encourages countries and enforce laws that require the use of helmets for motorcycle operators and passengers. Part of those laws has become the most effective method to increase the number of riders using a motorcycle helmet. There is evidence that the town offers the best protection against head injuries. As strange as it seems, surprisingly there are only 20 countries that have universal motorcycle helmet laws today. In 1975, nearly all countries require the use of motorcycle helmets, according to the April ‘ 08 issue of science journal. I suppose that it is no surprise to reduce the mortality rate of motorcycles increased in countries that do not apply universal motorcycle helmet laws. The following are some alarming facts:
According to NHTSA, in 2006, 4810 cyclists were killed and around 88.000 injured in traffic accidents in the United States. Per mile traveled, motorcyclists concerning 37 times more likely to die in a crash than someone in a passenger car. Head injury is the leading cause of death in motorcycle accident. The pilot not wearing a motorcycle helmet is 40% more likely to suffer a fatal injury in the head and 15 times more likely to suffer fatal injuries of stowaways who wore a motorcycle helmet. In 1984 the motorcycle helmet 19.230 lifesaving, 2006. A study conducted in 1994 by the national public services Research Institute came to the conclusion that wearing a motorcycle helmet will not interfere with peripheral vision or ability of the rider to hear audible signals. Since 1997, six state of Arkansas, Texas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Florida, and Pennsylvania) the universal helmet laws have weakened to limit coverage of under-age persons. It is six Nations since 1983 to repeal or weaken the universal motorcycle helmet laws. In August 2004, pleasant Louisiana use helmet for moto universal Fatal Car Accident Arkansas horror.